HUMANOID ROBOTS
Humanoid robots are challenging mechatronics structures with several interesting features.
Choosing a humanoid robot to develop applications or pursue research during a
given direction could be difficult thanks to the strong interdependence of the
technical aspects. These papers aim at giving a general description of this
inter-dependence and highlight the lessons learned from the impressive works
conducted in the past decade. The readers will find within the annexe a table
synthesizing the characteristics of the foremost relevant humanoid robots.
Without that specialized in a specific application, we consider two main classes
of humanoid robots: those dedicated to industrial application and therefore the
ones dedicated to human-robot interaction. The technical aspects are described in
a way that illustrates the humanoid robots bridging the gap between these two
classes.
Humanoid robots
are complex mechatronic systems. As such, it is necessary to consider the
mechanical structure, the computational system, and the algorithms as a whole
and for a given application. The robot’s size, weight, and strength are
important factors when designing its structure. Let us consider two general
classes of applications: physical performances while doing motion generation
and validation of biological and/or cognitive models. The ATLAS robot from Boston Dynamics is an example of the first category, while the Kaneshiro robot
from Tokyo University is an example of the second category.
When the goal is
to have a robot with walking speed performances around 2 to3km/h, the knowledge
from walking robots such as HRPs robots from Kawada Industries or the LOLA a robot from the Technological University of Munich shows that there are two
mechanical points to take into account the mass distribution one side and the
undesirable mechanical resonances on the other. The last point implies to
suppress compliance at the level of the joints and the links. For this reason,
most of the humanoid robots are very rigid to achieve high precision control.
When the human-robot interaction may be a major constraint during the planning
phase, the control precision isn't the most objective. The security level
necessary to allow physical interaction with a human is then obtained by
introducing actuators with low power and flexible mechanisms in the
transmissions, such as the one described in paragraph 3. There exist robot
designs that try to synthesize several constraints with more specific
objectives. For instance, the HRP-4 humanoid robotics lighter (39 kg) for the
size of 1.5mwith 34 degrees of freedom (DoFs). This is the results of compact
power electronics and a skeleton made from carbon fiber. The drawback is that
the robot segments are more flexible and therefore the low power actuators limit
the load that the robot can hold. A humanoid robot is the robots that can
easily do any task which a normal human can’t do; learn more about the robots
from InstaDissertation.
Comments
Post a Comment